Monday, August 04, 2008

Lambeth 2008 ends

Lambeth Conference to end with conciliatory statement
PATSY McGARRY, Religious Affairs Correspondent, in Canterbury

A CONCILIATORY statement is expected at the end of the Lambeth Conference in Canterbury, which concludes tomorrow evening.

Sources indicate the statement will be open and will demonstrate a willingness to embrace those approximately 250 Anglican bishops who stayed away from Lambeth 2008. They did so in protest at how decisions by North American provinces to consecrate a gay bishop and institute same-sex blessings have been dealt with to date.

Yesterday the 670 bishops attending the conference discussed a draft covenant presented by the Covenant Design Group. Archbishop Drexel Gomez, chairman of the design group, said the covenant would consider the bishops’ responses at a meeting in Singapore next month, after which the communion’s 44 churches, in 38 provinces, will be invited to make further submissions before the end of March next year, including those provinces absent from Lambeth 2008.

These will be considered by the design group at a meeting next April, following which they will make recommendations for a covenant to the Anglican Consultative Council (ACC), which will discuss it in June 2009. It is expected that the ACC will then invite churches/provinces to sign up to an agreed text.

Those who don’t “would not cease to be Anglican, but clearly they would be in a different relationship to those churches which do”, as one source put it yesterday.

The emphasis in the covenant document, as Archbishop Gomez explained yesterday, would be on “autonomy within communion” and “agreement in principle to staying and working together as a communion”. The covenant document will be in three sections: (i) dealing with inherited faith; (ii) addressing common mission; and (iii) looking at the consequences which flow out of working together.

The design group “did not attempt to produce a document dealing with the issues before the communion”, he said. It was “dealing with a framework” for addressing disputes, “not sanction”, he said. The covenant would “express explicitly the glue which holds the Anglican communion together”, another source said. It would not be legalistic, but rather would be a “relational” document.

Meanwhile, the Church of Ireland Primate, Archbishop Alan Harper, said yesterday he would prefer to see more regular Lambeth Conferences which would be “shorter, more focused, with fewer side-shows”. He spoke of his experience of the indaba process as “immensely positive”, and in particular the more recent sessions, which had been “very, very refreshing”.

He hoped the final document which emerges from the ACC next year would be “simple, uncomplicated, and will encapsulate what it means to be Anglican. If the things said here are not reflected in it there will be very significant disappointment,” he said.

Those bishops not present had been “missed” and “were prayed for almost every day. Their position was held by a good number here,” he said.
© 2008 The Irish Times


What the Lambeth Conference Accomplished

The Lambeth Conference accomplished some very important work, but in the closing press conference on Aug. 3, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams said if the North American churches do not accept the need for a moratorium on same-sex blessings and the consecration of additional partnered gay bishops, then the Anglican Communion is no further forward.

Archbishop Williams listed three accomplishments for the 20-day Lambeth Conference of Anglican bishops in Canterbury, England:

1 Bishops proved they could speak to each other respectfully and prayerfully.
2. They expressed a strong commitment to remain unified.
3. The Millennium Development Goals demonstration in London on July 24 proved that even “in its current rather wobbly state,” the Anglican Communion was capable of accomplishing significant action and witness.

On the other hand, the idea of moratorium was apparently not taken seriously by many bishops from The Episcopal Church. Bishops Jon Bruno of Los Angeles and Marc Andrus of California already have said they would not attempt to stop the blessing of gay relationships in their dioceses, and in the Diocese of Massachusetts on Aug. 2, two priests participated in civil same-sex marriages for two couples inside Episcopal churches.

“The current policy, well, I wouldn’t say policy of the American church, but some of the practices of dioceses, or certain dioceses, in the American church continues to put our relations as a Communion under strain and some problems won’t be resolved while those practices continue,” Archbishop Williams said. “I might just add, perhaps a note here. One complication in discussing all this is that assumption, readily made, that the blessing of a same-sex union and/or the ordination of someone in an active same-sex relationship is simply a matter of human rights … That’s an assumption I can’t accept because I think the issues about what conditions the church lays down for the blessing of unions has to be shaped by its own thinking, its own praying.”

Archbishop Williams was asked what was meant by the Windsor Continuation Group’s recommendation for a moratorium on public rites for same-sex blessings. Different parts of the world define public rites of blessing in different ways, adding to the confusion, according to Archbishop Williams. A primates’ communiqué following a meeting in Brazil in 2003 noted that in some places private prayers were said, but that was not intended to include public liturgies.

“There are those in the U.S.A. who would say ‘pastoral response.’ Well, it’s a blessing and I’m not very happy about that,” he said.

Innovations to church teaching on homosexuality in North America caused roughly 280 of the 880 invited bishops of the Anglican Communion to boycott the Lambeth Conference. According to registration information provided to The Living Church and Church of England Newspaper, the total number of Anglican bishops who pre-registered was only 617, and not all of them were present. The two largest provinces – Nigeria and Uganda – did not send any bishops. There was one bishop registered from Rwanda and five from Kenya. Conference organizers included all of the ecumenical bishops in attendance to arrive at the total of 670 present when registration closed on July 21.

Many of the bishops who were absent and a number who did attend the Lambeth Conference attended the Global Anglican Fellowship Conference (GAFCON) in Jerusalem in June. GAFCON and the absence of more than 30 percent of the bishops of the Communion were frequently mentioned during the conference. The absence of so many bishops from the Global South increased the proportional representation of bishops from The Episcopal Church to nearly a quarter of the overall total.

For various reasons the conference will probably run a deficit of at least $2 million. A document titled “Lambeth Conference Finances” dated January 2008 estimated that the bishops’ conference would cost about $9 million with the spouses’ conference adding another $2.5 million. The document notes that more than 40 percent of conference participants would require some sort of financial assistance in order to pay the $8,000 conference fee. During the closing press conference Archbishop Williams said conference organizers were studying various ways to cover the probable shortfall.

“We knew this would be difficult,” he said. “I don’t think I can go into details because I don’t have direct management of the question … I’m rather concerned about that.”

Steve Waring

No comments:

Facebook Badge

Peter Ainsworth's Facebook Profile